i remember years ago with a good friend and his family we went to a camp sitr in ryei in wales and they said they let the family stay but not me as i was a sigle male ive tried other camp sites on the net and there all the same they wont take single males but will take single females so its 99 percent that all camp sites or parks wont take single males and 100 per cent take single females so for people like me single divoiced male have to live like a hermit in there own home as we are not welcome anywhere so been on my own a very long time now living on my own as i cant go to clubs. camping sites, park sites because im single male so they see you as a risk around familes or females so we sigle males should live like a hermit on a dessert island or lock ourselfs away from all so what else can i say about being a sigle male does that meen ill get band from every naturist sites and may not exict in life as a single male thanks for reading this if it get read thanks MARK

No one should feel rejected from a mixed situation simply because of their gender - it is illogical and unfair. If it was women only or families only or gay only etc then there is something in the title that dictates who can go - but if it is open to all - then it should be open to all - and if anyone abuses the situation - man, woman or child then that is when they should be unwelcome. 
 

This may be slightly off topic but as a newbie to social naturism and living in a country were naturism is still illegal. I do wonder how many innocent and unfortunate incidents such as the one I mentioned in my second blog actually affect the situation with singles males in the naturist community. I think it can only do harm from reading this topic.
For those who haven't read the blog, I am ashamed to say my manhood took on a life of it's own in mixed company and it was mortifying for me. 

But this topic has opened my eyes as to the vicious reaction I got to my predicament on that fateful day and also Tanya's quick and thorough defence of me knowing I was a newbie and totally unprepared for such a verbal attack. 
I guess she didn't want to lose a naturist "partner in crime" for the lack of a better way to put it. After all naturism is still illegal here and it won't change in a hurry. I also understand why Tanya remarked on more than one occasion that she felt so happy and safe being out naked exploring the wilderness with me.

I knew from online experiences about the stigma attached to single/divorced males, I just never imagined it spilled over in to the real world with such abundance I am quite surprised and shocked to be honest.
A naturist single guy really has no chance in the UK from what I gather we are all tarred and feathered before we even leave our homes just for being single and male.

It has actually removed any desire of mine to go back to the UK in summer to experience social naturism on a grander scale. In fact this topic has actually settled me in many ways, I am now happy in what I have here knowing that being mostly alone isn't so bad after all so I'll stay here in Cyprus in my own little illegal naturist world. lol
On the very few unofficial nude beaches here we all keep to ourselves and don't mix we keep everything on the down-low so we don't attract too much attention.

I hope I didn't go to far off topic or offend anyone.

Joining some landed clubs may be a problem Colin but I think that the average venue, event or swim is welcoming of single men. Our expeience at NKD last year was that there were more single men than families - and that is a prime family event. There are certainly many single men in BN too. As for beaches I would say that as many single men frequent beaches (and it is a public space - so why shouldn't they) then it would be hard to imagine how they could be turned away or made unwelcome. After all they would have many other single men willing to protect them. 

As a naturist family (or when the boys are at school - couple) we have chatted to many single men - found out about beaches from them, offered them a biscuit or a slice of melon and certainly not stayed away from them or kept the boys away from them. Many of these men are regualrs to the beach in question - and we are the guests!

In relation to embarrassing penis moments. They are few and far between but on the very few times I have been passingly aware of them the man in question is suitably ignoring it and sitting waiting for it to pass or quietly walking down to the sea to cool off. There is a world of difference between exhibiting yourself, bringing attention to yourself and it simply happening beyond the person control. Some one who likes to strut about doesn't need to do that while aroused to appear an exhibitionist - while someone can accidentally become aroused without wishing to or wishing to bring attention to it. And if they ignore it and act sensible then why should they be chastised for it. 

For a start being aroused does not mean that one is sexually aroused. This can happen without any sexual thoughts or desire - to men and boys at any age. It can be more embarrassing for the man to deal with than for anyone noticing. And women can feel sexual attraction without it being obvious. So there are all sorts of reasons for men to be given a bit of a break here. But - and this is the biggie - that never excuses anyone publically and socially seeking to become aroused and showing it off. 

Everyone should be welcomed intom naturism and it should be their individual misbehaviour and actions that makes them unwanted - never their gender or the fact they were born with a penis.