I started a really long winded reply discussing the problem with rules. The short version is that rules are based on prohibit and punish. They assume the worse in people and seek to exclude those who would otherwise threaten our personal values.
Some of the reasons fringe venues appeal to me, like free beaches, virtually rule free clothing optional venues, is because they’re very inclusive and very often challenge my thinking. They present things that force me to process and more often than not, cause me to reassess my previously held views of the world.
In numerous modern workplaces diversity and inclusion has been found to offer many benefits. Foremost among them is a whole different way of thinking about things. Different cultural perspectives. Different life experiences. Different expectations about what is acceptable or not.
Within this environment rules don’t work as intended because people’s interpretation of them varies so dramatically. Some behaviours one group of people find abhorrent, like eating with your hands, is perfectly acceptable and polite in a different culture.
With rules you’ll inevitably end up like “Animal Farm” where all animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.
What does work is a common set of values for everyone to aspire to. Two in particular require a lot of vulnerability. “Open and honest communication” and “feedback driven improvement”.
One of the values everyone might agree on, in addition to these two foundational ones is “Respect other people’s boundaries”.
Fulfilling this value requires open and honest communication. What are their boundaries?
Diversity creates dialogue and dialogue and tolerance are two things badly missing in society.
For example, we tolerate the neighbours occasionally having a party and playing loud music quite late. They are often respectful by turning it down around 11:30pm or so. Occasionally they don’t. It’s so rare however, that we don’t bother saying anything because it’s not worth the hassle and potential ill feeling.
I once noticed an amorous couple discretely making love somewhat out in the open, but well away from likely onlookers, at a clothing optional venue. I respected their privacy by continuing my walk as if I hadn’t noticed them. At the time, within the context it was completely harmless.
If I had chosen to take offence at their behaviour, I then turn that into a whole different, troubling situation for all parties.
What you’ll always notice with rules, is that there’s always a group of people who think they can make an exception. They park on no-parking zones because they’re only going to be five minutes. They congest traffic in the meanwhile.
Same goes for handicap parking spaces. Never mind someone needed to drive around the block because the space was taken by someone who considers entitlement a sufficient handicap to quality them for the space while they “duck in quickly”.
Values encourage people to think about others. Values are community building. People learn and grow by seeing what good looks like.
When there’s a problem, it facilitates conversation and an examination of views. When you have rules, this becomes a battle of wills. An opposition of values and boundaries.
“Don’t run!”
“I was fast walking.”
“No loud music!”
“THIS IS HALF THE NORMAL VOLUME MATE.”
Maybe instead of rules, come up with a common set of values.